Accordingly, she gave the Agency 9 weeks to conduct a search for both sets of the requested materials and provide materials that respond to the request or provide PEER with an explanation as to why certain documents are being withheld from PEER’s perusal. Howell further agreed with PEER that the EPA was in violation with the FOIA. Howell noted that more than a year after PEER submitted its request the EPA had not even conducted a search for the requested materials. District Court in Washington to order the Agency to meet its FOIA obligation. The second set was any EPA documents that support the conclusion that human activity is not the largest factor driving global climate change.Īfter the legal time limit for the EPA to respond to the requests passed, PEER petitioned the U.S. The first set was any documents Pruitt relied on to make his statement.

Subsequently, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the EPA asking for two sets of documents. Pruitt’s public statement was made on March 9, 2017, when he told a CNN interviewer on air that he did not agree that human activity “is a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.” Following a controversial public statement made by EPA administrator Scott Pruitt concerning climate change, the EPA was faced with a court order to provide documents that back up the statement.

Scott pruitt public safety his drivers